Search This Blog

Friday 9 December 2011

Who is the Carrier of Risk - Insurance Companies or Common Man?


From last 10 years, I am witness of motor third party liability insurance pity condition in India.
Motor third party liability insurance is mandatory under section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act 1988 in India. Since the act was passed, every insurance company has to compulsorily accept the third party liability insurance. Very soon, it becomes the biggest roadblocks in the progress of Indian insurance companies’ profits. The reasons were huge claims especially in case commercial vehicles motor liability, long tailed in nature – generally takes 7- 8 years to settle, unpredictable awards made by the courts,  no limits placed by Motor vehicle act on the awards and as a whole the motor third party liability became riskier and capital intensive for the insurers day by day.
The issues were exaggerated in the year 2005 when regulatory bodies started receiving denial from the insurance companies to insure commercial vehicle for third party insurance. In April, 2007, regulators came up with the solution to the problem and introduce Indian Motor Third Party Insurance Pool (IMTPIP) for the commercial vehicle. Afterwards, the pool member insurers have started accepted commercial motor liability Insurance but it did not end their problems. In the next 3 years, the pool generated Rs 673 crore losses especially in commercial liability claims which were showing the losses of  470 crore in  the year 2008-09 increased almost 4 times from last year claims. It was clear evident from past data and with the current premium; the pool will become unsustainable in near future.
The recent committee report by IRDA on third liability pool gave solution to the critical issues of insurers. The insurance companies will now be able to decline the risk under the commercial motor liability in case it does not fit under their underwriting criteria or they are not capable of underwrite the risk. The denial of the risk will not end the insurance company responsibility, the same insurance company will act as policy servicing underwriter for GIC who will accept the risk in such cases. GIC (General Insurance Corporation), who is the only reinsurance company in India, will directly underwrite such risk through its separate website. A nodal officer will be invited from each insurance company to handle and give proposal number in each such case. In all the cases whether insurance company accept the risk or decline the risk, the dream to cover 100% motor vehicle insurance can become true. Now the white elephant of the Indian insurance industry has got some other way to fund the expenses. 
Are you really convinced that it is the solution of the problem? Atleast I am not !!
 The major lapse here is in the root cause analysis, whether the problem lies -
·      In settlement of claims
·      Non-issuance of the policy
·      High claim ratio of motor industry
·      Bad emergency management services in the country
·      Long claim settlement time taken by judiciary body




As per the WHO, India has the highest road accidents in the world. 

 
There are 24 life and non-life insurance companies in India (as per IRDA data 2011).  If all insurance companies in India join hands together and make a common pool or NGO for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) rather than motor third party claims, I think the country, common man as well motor third party insurance industry all will be better served.
Comments are invited.
Ruchi Agarwal,
MBA, FIII, ACII

8 comments:

  1. I think that in the end, the common man will carry the risk. In the sistemic view, when occur a sistemic crisis with confidence crisis, the goverments will help the insurance segment with public money. The origin of public funds will come via tax collections, issue of money, or issue of sovereign bonds. From these three source funds, the issue of bonds will have lower short-term impacts, whether having the investor to pay for it.

    Once created sistemic risk that could impact only on insurance segment or no, the common man will have to contribute in some way.

    In this way, the goverment should be ensure for balance of segment in humanity's pro.

    For balance the segment, the goverment mission will be find the better way to balance it. Creating the common contingency funds, or monitoring finantial health with ethic, prevent accumulation of bubbles,...

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have seen your blog, and found it very nice. Congrates.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think its both because post pulling of the TP Premium into the common pool its common man who have to pay higher premium for TP Cover...secondly insurance companies have to contribute their heavy share into the pool depending on the total TP exposure as declared by IRDA at the end of year...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sorry ,Me too not agree with the causes/extracts specified at the bottom of the article.Any body who had dealt the TP claims and attended the Courts and Lok Adalats in India will not agree with the same.
    Most of the claims are fake,exagerrated,inflated and bogus.With one accident with one death few natural death and other injured are added in Report.You had not mentioned the touts loitering in the hospitals/police stations so that they get the business from MACT practise.The law is very very loose and that too against the Insurers.Insurers are criminal and made a biggest blunder because poor chap had issue a policy covering a vehicle.(Mainly for TP Risk)
    The age the income the accident the very licence are fake and yet one is fastened to receive an Order from Court as he had isssued a policy.The attitude of judiciary the advocates is worth noting.
    The Insurer is left with no alternative but to pay with enhance interest much more than one get over the FD's.
    We are trying to increase the premium but not raising any voice against the unfair Act.
    People talk about the poor man died in the accident but dose any body gone and checked how much finaly he gets from the Award+Interest as a residual left over from Advocates and OTHERS?
    Why there are no co payments ment for Owner/Driver at least 10% ?
    Why transporters are employeing the fake DL holders?
    Why License are not banned for one year or two who are involved in the accidents
    Nothing is going to take place unless the existing M V Act is drasically changed.
    Transport lobby/advocates /and the system is not interested in changes in the MV Act .as this is a very lucrative business for them without any capital investment/Risk.
    So any Pool/ raising the premium will not have any effect on mounting losses
    as far as TP is concerned.UNLESS the law is amended or changed.
    Temporary solutions will give temporary relief as a sadetive effect but finally the pain will be there without fail.
    Just check and attend any MACT Court/Lok Adalats and one will realise the very ground dark realities.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Would like to know Emergency Management Projects and how its works.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If we are able to save the road accident victims in first one hour of the accident, the medical cost, fraud level and as well as third party liability cost will dramatically reduce. National insuance has designed a very specific policy on the same for one of my client for road accident insurance. I am attaching a relevant presentation on the same.(Sorry, I cant share any data of my work due to Data Privacy.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. HARIHARA VENKATESAN ANANTARAMAN29 January 2012 at 08:06

    The silverline is government machinery,hospitals and lawyers.if these cartel wherever they exist are not broken,the problem will be in square one.can u control fir today?it starts with that.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree to you completely but as the insurance professionals, we should first take steps to improve our system and once we can do that then we can ask for same help from the government and if not government, we can certainly get help from Regulatory bodies and NGO's in reducing motor accidents.

    If a road accident happens and immediately insurance company controlled ambulance provides medical care and admits the patient to the hospital. i strongly believe that it will reduce the medical injury payments, reduce frauds and at the same time, leads to less number of deaths. If this process is able to reduce 20% of claim cost (20% of Apprx 7000 Crores = 1400 Crore) resulting from motor insurance (20% of Apprx 7000 Crores = 1400 Crore). I hope, we can save the motor insurance industry by this way.

    ReplyDelete